The jurassic park franchise is a landmark series of films, not least because of its original entry. Although the follow-up The lost Worldwas not considered as good, it is still considered much better than the third film. Jurassic Park 3 was long awaited by fans due to the gap between its release and the previous film, but it ended up being nothing but a disappointment for many.
However, Jurassic Park 3 has its fans and advocates, including the film’s star, Sam Neill. Although this appears to simply be a situation where the star of the film defends his work, Neill’s statements about the third jurassic park make a lot of sense. This defense shows how intimate cinema can become for actors, while also highlighting some overlooked positive aspects of film. As the Jurassic The series is coming to an end, here’s why its original ending wasn’t as bad as many thought.
Sam Neill loved making Jurassic Park III for its action and pace
Sam Neill has always defended Jurassic Park III, which is considered by many to be the worst of the original trilogy. The actor who plays Alan Grant said he had a lot of fun making the film, especially working alongside Alessandro Nivola. The biggest point he comments on liking is the action, which is something that Jurassic Park 3 does incredibly well. The film’s rapid pace takes it from setting to setting, each filled with gruesome deaths and harrowing action sequences where the heroes race for their lives in terror. The dinosaur action is especially better than ever, whether it’s the chase scenes involving the raptors or anything with the Spinosaurus. The latter’s battle with the franchise’s iconic T. Rex may take some criticism from some fans, but there’s no denying that it’s a cool visual treat to watch.
Neill’s biggest criticism is one that many have already commented on in this Jurassic Park 3 ends too abruptly and cleanly. The movie feels light years faster than jurassic park and particularly The Lost World: Jurassic Park, which is again due to the fact that he jumps so quickly from scene to scene. It ends with lightning speed, but the ending doesn’t feel particularly deserved or impactful. Several characters are underdeveloped because of this, making their survival or death much less impactful. Even with those valid reviews remaining, Neill is right about how good the action is and how the frenetic pace sometimes heightens the tension.
Jurassic Park III tried new things with the franchise
Another aspect of Jurassic Park 3 that many don’t attribute to him is how he took the franchise in different directions. There were no major new dinosaurs introduced in The lost World besides the tiny Compies, with the Velociraptors and the T. Rex once again reigning supreme on the screen. It felt somewhat redundant, especially since the whole premise was about discovering a “lost world”. Jurassic Park 3 features the deadly Spinosaurus, while also featuring redesigned raptors that look like a complete narrative device considering Alan Grant’s presentation. The pterodactyls are also eventually introduced beyond mere glimpses, and their birdcage scene (which is taken from the original jurassic park book) showed how even seemingly non-threatening dinosaurs could become fierce threats.
One big change was the character of Billy, who seemed poised to replace Alan Grant as the show’s hero. Instead, he betrays him through his own greed, leading Alan to compare him to the insane ambitions of John Hammond and InGen. This contrasts Ellie Sattler’s Billy, Ian Malcolm, and other characters introduced to the franchise thus far, turning a sidekick into an unexpected antagonist. Of course, that probably won’t save the movie in many eyes, and it’s certainly not on the same level as the first or even the second movie. At the same time, there are aspects of Jurassic Park 3 which pushed the franchise forward, ensuring that life somehow found a way.